Rog Podcasts Covering the 2013 AVN Awards Voting Part 2

Get Email Updates!


, , , , , ,

Set Your Language

About the Author

Roger T. Pipe

It started as a cure for writers block. I was working on some other projects and would come home every night and write in a journal as a warm up. One day, I was reading and found some reviews of porn flicks. I've always loved movies and porn, so I decided to review some tapes form my personal porn collection. I wrote a review, found that I liked it and posted it to asm. The feedback was positive and I just kept writing. I found it a great way to get me started each day, writing about something I enjoyed and pretty soon, people were asking me to review their films and work on a web site. The rest, as they say, is history.

Rog Podcasts Covering the 2013 AVN Awards Voting

As I did last year, I am going to do a series of podcasts focusing on the 2013 AVN Awards. I will post the clips here for you to enjoy.

As a voter for the past several AVN Awards, I have been lucky enough to take part in this huge event. The podcasts will cover the process as well as break down several of the categories. They will highlight some of my favorites and discuss some interesting choices and the “can’t miss” titles/performers from the past year.

I hope you enjoy these. As always, your feedback is very welcome. Let me know what you think of the podcasts, the categories, the voting, tell me I am wrong or just tell me how fucking great this whole thing is.

Here is the complete series of 2013 AVN Awards voting podcasts:

Part Two: Best Anal Series, etc.
Part One: Overview of the voting process, Best Actor, Best Actress etc.

Here are last year’s podcasts if you want to go back and listen to those.

Part One:
Part Two:
Part Three:
Part Four:
Part Five:
Part Six:
Part Seven:
Part Eight:

Did you like this? Share it:

One Response to “Rog Podcasts Covering the 2013 AVN Awards Voting Part 2”

  1. Houstondon says:

    I always enjoy the podcasts and gleam something that helps my own voting experience. For example, you point out the process where we have to rank order nominees; something few people outside voting seem to know about. Your comment on “criteria” hits home too, the lack of formal criteria in each category opening up a world of interpretations. Some of this ties in with personal tastes, for example some really hate parodies while others really like them which colors where voters will rank something on a given list.

    In groups like best performer, some of us will see dozens of movies with one nominee and perhaps a few with another nominee, how we apply our observations sure to impact final scoring (such as, if you see some mediocre performances by one of the nominees, how much does that factor in?). Some performers are well versed in gonzo but stink in features or vignettes, others are good in a variety of genres, the same holding true for directors (some of my favorite gonzo directors never stray from their formulas or niche). In all though, I think the nomination/award processes for the major groups (AVN, XBiz) have improved each year. Okay, back to watching more stuff for voting…

Leave a Reply

Please Answer the Following to Post: * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.

Copyright © 2019 RogReviews.